Rotator Cuff Repair: What Makes It Worthwhile? Patients Have a Number…and It’s Big
Jul 01, 2025
When it comes to rotator cuff surgery, we often ask: “Does it work?”
But a better question might be: “How much better than non-surgical treatment does it need to be for patients to say it’s worth it?”
A 2025 study by Hansford et al. used a benefit-harm trade-off method to answer that. Patients with persistent shoulder pain were asked how much improvement in pain and function they’d require from surgery (compared to non-surgical care) to make it worthwhile.
The median answer?
A 40% improvement, equivalent to 28 points on the WORC Index.
That’s a high bar.
Now zoom out to the broader evidence base. A 2019 systematic review and meta-analysis by Karjalainen et al. showed that rotator cuff repair surgery offers only small, often clinically insignificant, improvements over non-surgical treatment. Certainly not 40% better.
This discrepancy matters.
It tells us two things:
- We should rethink default surgical pathways for rotator cuff-related pain.
- We must integrate patient-defined thresholds, like the smallest worthwhile effect, into decision-making.
Surgery can help, but does it help enough to justify the risks, costs, and recovery?
A small benefit may not be enough, according to the stakeholders that really matter, people with shoulder pain.
The Complete Clinician
Tired of continuing education that treats clinicians like children who can’t think for themselves?
The Complete Clinician was built for those who want more.
It’s not another lecture library, it’s a problem-solving community for MSK professionals who want to reason better, think deeper, and translate evidence into practice.
Weekly research reviews, monthly PhD-level lectures, daily discussion, and structured learning modules to sharpen your clinical edge.
Join the clinicians who refuse to be average.
